Menu
Kelcey Patrick-Ferree Law Iowa Minnesota header logo
Midwest Business Law Firm Serving Iowa & Minnesota
  • About
    • Who is Kelcey Patrick-Ferree?
    • Who is David Ferree?
  • Areas of Practice
    • Business Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • Contracts & Licensing
    • eCommerce
    • Privacy & Data Security
  • Blog
  • Resources
Close Menu

Contact Us Today

Contracts & Licensing

Employment Non-Compete Clauses and Liquidated Damages in Iowa

Justin Business Law, Contracts and Licensing employment law, Iowa, Iowa Court of Appeals, Liquidated Damages, Non-compete, Noncompete, Restrictve Covenant, Retraint of trade

If you have ever signed an employment agreement, or asked your employees to sign one, it probably had a covenant not to compete with the employer if the employee leaves the business. These clauses are usually called “non-competes.” They typically limit the time and the geographic area within which the former employee can perform the same kind of work and/or work in the same industry. But how enforceable are they? A recent Iowa Court of Appeals decision, Cedar Valley Medical Specialists, PC v. James Wright, M.D., shows both how these clauses are used and what the courts think of them.

Wright, a cardiothoracic surgeon, entered into an employment contract with Cedar Valley Medical Specialists, PC, in Black Hawk County, Iowa. In the contract, Wright agreed that if he left the employment he would not practice medicine within 35 miles of Black Hawk County for a period of two years after leaving. He also agreed that if he did not comply with the restrictions, he would pay as liquidated damages the greater of $100,000 or his last 6 months’ salary with the group.

Wright retired from the medical group and went to work for a local hospital the next day. The medical group sued to enforce the agreement and won in the district court. Wright appealed, and the Iowa Court of Appeals ruled on his case on October 9, 2019. 

The court began its analysis by stating the Iowa law on restrictive covenants, saying:

Because restrictive covenants involve the partial restraint of trade, we construe them against the party seeking enforcement and approve them with some reluctance. We apply a three-pronged test to determine whether an employment contract with a restrictive covenant is enforceable: (1) Is the restriction reasonably necessary for the protection of the employer’s business; (2) is it unreasonably restrictive of the employee’s rights; and (3) is it prejudicial to the public interest?

– Cedar Valley Medical Specialists, PC v. James Wright, M.D.

As you can see, the courts do not automatically enforce these contractual provisions, but rather engage in a balancing of interests among the employer, the employee, and the public good. Moreover, the burden is on the employer to prove it is entitled to enforce the covenant.

As to the first prong, the court found the covenant was reasonably necessary to protect the employer. The market for Wright’s specialty was limited; Wright had confidential information about the medical group’s operations; and the group had supported, promoted, and invested heavily in Wright. When he left, the group lost the revenue he would have brought in.

The court next found that the restrictions were reasonable as to time and geographic area.

Wright argued that the public interest favored striking the clause. If he, the only cardiothoracic surgeon within 50 miles, was prohibited from practicing his specialty, there would be none. Lives hung in the balance. The court rejected this argument, noting that there were only three or four emergency cases annually and there were other providers close enough by. Besides, the former employer was not seeking an injunction (that is, it was not trying to prohibit Wright from practicing medicine); it was asking to enforce the liquidated damages provision to make up the losses it suffered when Wright went to work for a competitor. 

The second part of the analysis of this non-compete clause was the reasonableness of the liquidated damages provision. Liquidated damages are damages agreed to when a contract is made that will be paid if a party breaches the contract. They are enforceable if: 1) they were a reasonable estimate, at the time the contract was entered into, of the damages that will be suffered if the contract is breached; and 2) the amount of actual damage is difficult to determine. Given the investment the former employer made in Wright and the lost revenue it would likely suffer if Wright were to compete with them, the court found the clause to be reasonable and enforceable.

If you need assistance with an enforceable non-compete for your employees, feel free to contact us for assistance.

Iowa Supreme Court Takes Conservative Approach to Airspace Hazards Updating Your Website? Update Your Terms!

Related Posts

Contracts & Licensing

Business Law, Contracts and Licensing

Contracts in Disasters and Emergencies

Working from home woman business owner typing and texting.

Business Law

Ideas for Businesses and Business Owners Unexpectedly Working From Home Part II

Working from home woman business owner typing and texting.

Business Law, Compliance, Contracts and Licensing, Intellectual Property

Ideas for Businesses and Business Owners Unexpectedly Working From Home Part I

Recent Posts

  • Contracts in Disasters and Emergencies
  • Ideas for Businesses and Business Owners Unexpectedly Working From Home Part II
  • Ideas for Businesses and Business Owners Unexpectedly Working From Home Part I
  • COVID-19 Coronavirus and Resources for Your Business
  • Updating Your Website? Update Your Terms!

Categories

  • Business Law
  • Compliance
  • Contracts and Licensing
  • Government
  • Intellectual Property
  • Internet
  • Privacy and Data Security
  • Real Estate and Land Leasing
  • Social Media
  • Uncategorized

Tags

Advertising CAN-SPAM Compliance Contracts Contracts and Licensing Copyright Copyright Act Copyright Infringement Copyright Office Coronavirus COVID-19 Creative Commons Crowdfunding Distinctiveness Emerging Growth Company Eminent domain Fair Use Funding Platform How Do I Protect My Idea? Intellectual Property Internet Internet Law Iowa Iowa Supreme Court JOBS Act Legal Terms in Real Life Licensing New Terms of Use Nondisclosure Agreement Patent Pinterest Pinterest Fair Use Pinterest Terms of Service Pinterest Terms of Use privacy policy Service Mark Small Business Social Media Supreme Court Terms of Service Terms of Use Trademark Trade Secret Types of IP Web Sharing

How Can We Help?

Contracts & Licensing

Contracts in Disasters and Emergencies

Recent Posts

To schedule your initial free consultation,
fill out this form:

Contact Us
Checkboxes *
Kelcey Patrick-Ferree Law header logo
  • About
    • Who is Kelcey Patrick-Ferree?
    • Who is David Ferree?
  • Areas of Practice
    • Business Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • Contracts & Licensing
    • eCommerce
    • Privacy & Data Security
  • Blog
  • Resources

Minnesota: 612.568.5573

Iowa: 319.383.0659

136 South Dubuque St, Iowa City, IA 52240

By Appointment Only

© 2021 Patrick-Ferree Law, P.L.L.C. | Website Development by Vortex Digital Business Solutions © – All Rights Reserved | Contact Webmaster
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Disclaimer

The information provided on this website, including the blog, is not intended to be and should not be relied upon as legal advice. Using this website or contacting Patrick-Ferree Law, P.L.L.C. through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship. As a general rule, you should not provide any confidential information to any attorney until an attorney-client relationship has been established in writing. Please feel free to contact Patrick-Ferree Law, P.L.L.C. for an initial consultation, but be aware that this does not form an attorney-client relationship. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. A description or indication of practice does not mean that any agency or board has certified such lawyer is necessarily any more expert or competent than any other lawyer. All potential clients are urged to make their own independent investigation and evaluation of any lawyer being considered. Attorney advertising.